Original Article
Impact of Trade Liberalisation Policies on the Coconut Export from India
Year: 2020 | Month: December | Volume 65 | Issue 4
2.Ghosh, N. 2009. Effects of tariff liberalization on oilseed and edible oil sector in India: Who wins and who loses? Working Paper No. 2, Takshashila Academia of Economic Research Limited, Andheri (East), Mumbai, India, pp. 45.
View at Google Scholar3.GOI. 2011. Price policy for copra the 2012 season. Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, Dept. of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, pp 77.
View at Google Scholar4.Jayasekhar, S., Chandran, K.P., Thamban, C. and Muralidharan, K. 2019. Coconut sector in India experiencing a new regime of trade and policy environment: A critical analysis. J. Plant. Crops, 47(1): 48-54.
View at Google Scholar5.Jnanadevan, R. 2017. Copra and coconut oil - The production trend in India. Indian Coconut J., 59(10): 10-12.
View at Google Scholar6.Mathew, T. M. and Baby, P.O. 2011. Global competitiveness of Indian coconut oil-an outlook. Indian Coconut J., 51(6): 5-13.
View at Google Scholar7.Rethinam, P. and Idroes, S. 2005. Coconut: Steps for yield increase. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. In: Ram, N. (Ed.), Kasthuri and Sons Ltd., Chennai, India, pp.89-92.
View at Google Scholar8.Samarajeewa, S.R., Weeraheewa, J. and Gunatilake, H.M. 2002. Tariff policy liberalisation in edible oil market and its implications on the coconut producers in Sri Lanka. Trop. Agric. Res., 14: 317-326.
View at Google Scholar9.Sebastian, K.S. 2015. Indian coconut exports scaling new heights. Indian Coconut J., 58(6): 6-9.
View at Google Scholar10.Singh, A. K. 2016. Coconut development in India- The status. Indian Coconut J., 59(6): 5-10.
View at Google Scholar11.Thasnimol, F. and Prema, A. 2017. Performance and competitiveness of coconut trade in India. Trends Biosci. 10(22): 4495-4499
View at Google Scholar12.Vasanthkumar, V.C., Viswam, R.P., Vijayan, R. and Thomas, G. 2015. Coconut oil market- an insight and the way forward. Indian Coconut J., 58(2): 6-9.
View at Google Scholar