Original Article
Production and Marketing Analysis of Knol-khol under Sub-Tropical Conditions of Jammu Region: A case study
Year: 2018 | Month: September | Volume 63 | Issue 3
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. 1984. Models for estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30: 1078–1092.
View at Google ScholarCharnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444
View at Google ScholarCoelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J. and Battese, G.E. 1998. An Introduction to Productivity and Efficiency Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Science, New York
View at Google ScholarDebreu, G. 1951. The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3): 273–292
View at Google ScholarFare, R. and Lovell, C.A.K. 1978. Measuring technical efficiency in production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1): 150–162
View at Google ScholarFarrell, M.J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253–290.
View at Google ScholarKachroo, J., Bhat, Anil and Kachroo, D. 2012. Economic Evaluation of Production and Marketing of Orange in Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir state. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 26(1): 150-167.
View at Google ScholarNHB, 2011. National Horticultural Board, (web site: www. nhb.gov.in), New Delhi
View at Google ScholarRamunathan, R. 2003. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement. Sage Publication, New Delhi.
View at Google ScholarSharma, S.K. and Raina, D. 2013. Performance analysis of Indian automobile sector using non-parametric approach. International Journal of Business Excellence, 6(5): 505-525.
View at Google ScholarSreenivasa Murthy, D., Sudha, M., Hegde, M.R. and Dakshinamoorthy, V. 2009. Technical Efficiency and its Determinants in Tomato Production in Karnataka, India: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22: 215-224
View at Google Scholar



