Original Article

Socio-Economic Impact of Protected Cultivation on Tomato Growers of Himachal Pradesh

Year: 2020 | Month: March | Volume 65 | Issue 1

References (15)

1.Kallega, H.K., Kar, A. and Mathur, V.C. 2015. Temporal and Spatial Performance of Horticultural Crops in India. Economic Affairs, 60: 367-373.

View at Google Scholar

2.Kaur, D. 2009. Economics of polyhouse technology in Una district of Himachal Pradesh. Thesis M.Sc. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India.

View at Google Scholar

3.Kumar, P., Chauhan, R.S. and Grover, R.K. 2016. Economic analysis of tomato cultivation under poly house and open field conditions in Haryana, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences, 8: 846-848.

View at Google Scholar

4.Kumar, R.S. and Arumugam, T. 2010. Performance of vegetables under naturally ventilated polyhouse conditions. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44: 770-776.

View at Google Scholar

5.Meena, S., Singh, I.P. and Meena, R.L. 2016. Cost of cultivation and returns on different cost concepts basis of onion in Rajasthan. Economic Affairs, 61: 11-16.

View at Google Scholar

6.Mwangi, W.J. 2012. Comparative analysis of greenhouse versus open-field small scale tomato production in Nakuru-North district, Kenya. Thesis M.Sc., Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Management, Egerton University, Kenya.

View at Google Scholar

7.Parvej, M.R., Khan, M.A. and Awal, M.A. 2010. Phenological development and production potentials of tomato under polyhouse climate. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5: 19-31.

View at Google Scholar

8.Sethi, V.P., Tarsem, L., Gupta, Y.P. and Hans, V.S. 2003. Effect of greenhouse micro climate on the selected summer vegetables. Journal of Research, 40: 415-419.

View at Google Scholar

9.Sharma, K.D., Pathania, M.S., Bala, B. and Gupta, M. 2013. Developing technologies for protected cultivation in Himachal Pradesh-economics and marketing strategies. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, CSKHPKV, Palampur. Research Report, 66: 111-115.

View at Google Scholar

10.Sharma, P. 2012. Financial viability of protected cultivation and its impact on farm economy in Mandi district of Himachal Pradesh. Thesis M.Sc. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India.

View at Google Scholar

11.Sharma, P. 2012. Financial viability of protected cultivation and its impact on farm economy in Mandi district of Himachal Pradesh. Thesis M.Sc. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India.

View at Google Scholar

12.Shende, N.V. and Meshram, R.R. 2015. Cost benefit analysis and marketing of tomato. American International Journal of Research in Formal, Applied & Natural Sciences, 11: 46-54.

View at Google Scholar

13.Singh, A.K., Singh, B. and Gupta, R. 2011. Performance of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum) varieties and economics under protected and open field conditions in Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81: 973–975.

View at Google Scholar

14.Singh, B. and Sirohi, N.P.S. 2006. Protected cultivation of vegetables in India: problems and future prospects. Actahorticulturae (ISHS). 710: 339-342.

View at Google Scholar

15.Spehia, R.S. 2015. Status and impact of protected cultivation in Himachal Pradesh, India. Current Science, 108: 2254-2257.

View at Google Scholar

Economic Affairs, Quarterly Journal of Economics| In Association with AESRA

1891624 - Visitors since February 20, 2019